Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: Trends and Effects of the Global Increase in the Frequency and Diversity of Cyber Attacks

-



Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: Trends and Effects of the Global Increase in the Frequency and Diversity of Cyber Attacks

In today’s world, where data breaches and cybercrimes are the order of the day, cyberspace threats and scopes are shifting dramatically due to the presence of AI in modern-day attacks and its utilization by defensive measures. As educational institutions try to remain afloat alongside the ever-growing pool of sensitive materials and have data censorship placed on them, it becomes evident how expanding AI contacts will change the world for better and worse (Robert et al., 2024).

The Technology: AI in Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity has become a critical practice field, and AI has been the center pillar. On the one hand, attackers use AI to increase cyberattacks' sophistication, efficiency, and effectiveness (Robert et al., 2024). AI applications allow intruders to self-service multiple processes, circumvent security features, and create more realistic phishing schemes. Organizations also use AI-based resources to improve security threat identification, monitoring, and incident response methods and processes (Robert et al., 2024). With AI technologies, colleges and universities can detect irregularities or prospective threats and respond to them faster and more effectively than ever before (Robert et al., 2024).

The Key Trend: Cyber Attacks and Progression of the Sophistication Due to AI Technology
The video centers on one important trend: progress in attacks has always been, is, and most likely will always be assisted by Artificial Intelligence. Threat actors are using AI to build tougher and potentially more aggressive attacks in determining the intent of the attack (Robert et al., 2024). This increase needs to be matched by a corresponding increase in defensive capabilities. Organizations must now deal with AI-powered attacks that can outsmart defense mechanisms (Robert et al., 2024).

Forces Responsible for the Trend and Technology
It is more difficult for artificial intelligence to enter cybersecurity if its creators are filled with technological possibilities and are not significantly constrained by economic reasons. Thus, two main forces affect this trend and AI adaptation in cybersecurity solutions: technological advancement and economic limitations.

  1. Technological Innovation:
    The growth of AI technology and its application have kept the opportunities for attackers and their victims low (Robert et al., 2024). The latest generation of AI is so sophisticated that even cybercriminals can harness its power to launch mass attacks (Robert et al., 2024). With this development, organizations continue to look for innovative solutions and introduce the latest AI-integrated technologies for security purposes (Robert et al., 2024).
  2. Economic Constraints:
    Philological factors affect lower institutions in response to the emergence of highly sophisticated cyberattacks (Robert et al., 2024). Due to the fall in enrollment and accompanying revenue associated with workforce challenges, many colleges and universities face financial constraints. In strained budgets, allocating adequate resources to security may be highly challenging (Robert et al., 2024).

Navigating the Challenges
How should institutions respond to these forces? Perhaps it is appropriate to respond to these forces in their case; this includes investment in technology and human capital (Robert et al., 2024). Institutions can further consider partnering with selected vendors who specialize in AI and machine learning-based cybersecurity and undertake risk to ensure due diligence (Robert et al., 2024).

Conclusion
The introduction of AI in cybersecurity illustrates different and contending forces of economic and technological development in providing higher education. With the growing sophistication of cyber threats because of AI, institutions need to keep up with new and evolving defenses and the forces that affect the adoption of such defenses (Robert et al., 2024).

References

Robert, J., Muscanell, N., Arbino, N., McCormack, M., & Reeves, J. (2024). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Cybersecurity and Privacy Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://www.educause.edu

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs): Human Enhancement Technology and its Applications

-
In Medicine, Neuroprosthesis is Best Applied in Three Areas: Compassion, Neuroscience, and Business.  Cognitive technology and robotics have a unique quality in countering the existing conditions of society and enabling humanity to seek future possibilities. It offers us an integrated approach towards Human-Computer Interaction, Empathy, and technology development, fostering familiar experiences and practical solutions to arise. The unprecedented inventions, however, come with severe concerns and impact on individual and societal bases. Technologies such as Cognitive implants deserve attention as the potential applications can be limitless with appropriate attention to ethical implications and social concerns, as any new technology.  Our attitude towards integrating divergence into a Congruent society would greatly determine the development of new technologies. Employing neuroprosthetics extensively aids us and our businesses in granting the ability to further augment and empo...
Read more

Navigating Sociotechnical Challenges: Lessons from Kodak and Strategies for AI-IoT Innovation Success

-
 Sociotechnical plans aim to harmonize the relationship between technology, people, and processes. However, external and internal forces, such as technological advancements, cultural resistance, economic shifts, and ethical challenges, can disrupt the most robust plans. This discussion explores an organization that faced unexpected challenges despite careful planning, connects these lessons to my sociotechnical plan, and analyzes two fundamental forces that could influence its success. Relevant course concepts, examples, and mitigation strategies are integrated to enhance the discussion. Organizational Example: Kodak’s Struggle with Digital Transformation Kodak's decline is a classic example of how even a well-established company can falter when external forces outpace internal adaptability. Despite inventing the digital camera in 1975, Kodak delayed its entry into the digital market to protect its film business. This strategic inertia focused on sustaining short-term profits over ...
Read more

From Military Service to Cybersecurity: My Journey

-
From Military Service to Cybersecurity: My Journey Hello, my name is Tony Dennis . After 24 years of service as a Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3) in the US Army, I retired with a career dedicated primarily to network security and information assurance at the enterprise level . These experiences laid the foundation for my current role as a cybersecurity engineer . In this position, I manage various security initiatives, including Microsoft 365 Security , Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) , Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS) , privilege access management (PAM) , and incident response . Every day presents new challenges as I work to monitor and maintain security systems , safeguarding data and users from ever-evolving cyber threats . I am also on a unique journey as a doctoral student , working toward a degree to graduate in October 2026 , the same month I turn sixty . Several factors drive me toward this academic milestone: being the first in my family to attain s...
Read more